banner



Gtx 970 Vs Rx 580 8gb Benchmark

AMD Radeon RX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Price now 444$

Games supported 93%

Cost now 250$

Games supported 96%

Full general info

Comparing of graphics card architecture, marketplace segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in functioning rating 157 139
Value for coin 27.05 35.09
Architecture Polaris Maxwell
GPU code name Polaris 20 GM204
Market segment Desktop Desktop
Release date 18 April 2017 (4 years ago) xix September 2014 (7 years agone)
Launch price (MSRP) $229 $329
Price at present $444 (1.9x MSRP) $250 (0.8x MSRP)

Value for money

To become the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, only for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Annotation that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 2304 no information
CUDA cores no data 1664
Core clock speed 1257 MHz no data
Boost clock speed 1340 MHz 1178 MHz
Number of transistors 5,700 million 5,200 million
Manufacturing procedure engineering 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal pattern power (TDP) 185 Watt no data
Maximum GPU temperature no data 98 °C
Texture make full rate 193.0 109 billion/sec
Floating-point performance 6,175 gflops 3,920 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards it's interface and jitney (motherboard compatibility), boosted ability connectors (ability supply compatibility).

Bus support no data PCI Limited 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Height no data 4.376" (eleven.ane cm)
Width two-slot no data
Recommended organisation ability (PSU) no data 500 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x viii-pin no data
SLI options no information +

Retention

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and employ a shared part of system RAM.

Memory blazon GDDR5 no data
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB no data
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Fleck
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vii.0 GB/s
Retentivity bandwidth 256.0 GB/s 224 GB/s
Shared retention no data -

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, information in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (then-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may modify the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI two.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor support no information 4 displays
HDMI + no information
HDCP no data +
Maximum VGA resolution no data 2048x1536
Chiliad-SYNC support no data +
Audio input for HDMI no data Internal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you lot need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream no information +
GeForce ShadowPlay no information +
GPU Boost no information 2.0
GameWorks no information +

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX 12 (12_0) no data
Shader Model half-dozen.four six.four
OpenGL 4.6 4.iv
OpenCL 2.0 no data
Vulkan 1.ii.131 1.1.126
CUDA no data +

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming criterion performance comparing. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you lot find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments section, nosotros unremarkably set problems quickly.

  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Burn Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Operation GPU
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark Ice Tempest GPU
  • Passmark

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for habitation PCs and basic notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. Just similar Ice Tempest benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Burn Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features ii carve up tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery beast seemingly fabricated of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken transport, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded past Time Spy.

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX x benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a body of water cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Water ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, function of 3DMark suite. Water ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level nine to display a boxing between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded past 3DMark Night Raid.

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics carte a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing iv split benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, x, 11 and 12 (the last being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon RX 580 and GeForce GTX 970. Normally measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 478 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred) no data 1.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no information 22.21 Mh/south
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.48 kh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 291.61 Sol/s

Gaming performance

Let'due south see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1080p 98 83
1440p 43 54
4K 36 38

1920x1080
Medium Preset

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 58

+75.8%

xxx−35

−75.8%

Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 30−33

−10%

30−35

+x%

Battlefield 5 124

+276%

xxx−35

−276%

Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare thirty−33

−ten%

30−35

+ten%

Cyberpunk 2077 thirty−33

−ten%

30−35

+10%

Far Cry 5 83

+152%

30−35

−152%

Far Weep New Dawn 83

+152%

thirty−35

−152%

Forza Horizon 4 108

+227%

30−35

−227%

Hitman 3 30−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Red Dead Redemption 2 thirty−33

−10%

30−35

+x%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 74

+124%

30−35

−124%

Watch Dogs: Legion xxx−33

−x%

30−35

+10%

1920x1080
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47

+42.4%

30−35

−42.4%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla thirty−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Battlefield 5 102

+209%

30−35

−209%

Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare thirty−33

−ten%

30−35

+ten%

Cyberpunk 2077 xxx−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Far Cry 5 76

+130%

30−35

−130%

Far Cry New Dawn 78

+136%

30−35

−136%

Forza Horizon 4 101

+206%

30−35

−206%

Hitman 3 30−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Horizon Cipher Dawn 30−33

−10%

thirty−35

+10%

Metro Exodus 48

+23.1%

39

−23.1%

Cherry-red Dead Redemption 2 thirty−33

−10%

30−35

+ten%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63

+ninety.9%

30−35

−90.nine%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72

−12.five%

81

+12.5%

Watch Dogs: Legion thirty−33

−x%

30−35

+10%

1920x1080
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 34

+three%

xxx−35

−three%

Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 30−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Battlefield 5 93

+93.viii%

48

−93.8%

Cyberpunk 2077 thirty−33

−10%

xxx−35

+10%

Far Cry 5 71

+115%

30−35

−115%

Far Weep New Dawn 71

+115%

thirty−35

−115%

Forza Horizon iv 82

+148%

30−35

−148%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44

+ii.iii%

43

−two.three%

Scout Dogs: Legion 30−33

−x%

30−35

+10%

2560x1440
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33

−ten%

xxx−35

+10%

Hitman three 30−33

−ten%

30−35

+10%

Horizon Zero Dawn xxx−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Metro Exodus 28

+16.7%

24

−16.seven%

Cherry Dead Redemption 2 30−33

−ten%

30−35

+ten%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33

−10%

30−35

+x%

2560x1440
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey thirty−33

−10%

thirty−35

+10%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33

−x%

30−35

+10%

Battlefield 5 30−33

−ten%

30−35

+10%

Cyberpunk 2077 xxx−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Far Cry v 30−33

−10%

xxx−35

+x%

Far Cry New Dawn 53

+threescore.6%

30−35

−60.6%

Forza Horizon four 30−33

−10%

30−35

+x%

Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33

−x%

xxx−35

+10%

3840x2160
High Preset

Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33

−ten%

thirty−35

+ten%

Hitman 3 30−33

−x%

thirty−35

+x%

Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Metro Exodus 18

+38.5%

thirteen

−38.5%

Ruby-red Dead Redemption 2 30−33

−ten%

30−35

+10%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20

−65%

30−35

+65%

The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 27

−7.4%

29

+7.4%

3840x2160
Ultra Preset

Assassinator'southward Creed Odyssey 18

−83.3%

xxx−35

+83.3%

Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla xxx−33

−10%

30−35

+x%

Battlefield 5 37

+85%

20

−85%

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33

−10%

30−35

+10%

Far Cry 5 26

−26.nine%

thirty−35

+26.9%

Far Cry New Dawn 29

−xiii.8%

30−35

+thirteen.viii%

Forza Horizon 4 41

+24.2%

30−35

−24.2%

Lookout Dogs: Legion 30−33

−10%

30−35

+x%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 30.34 33.02
Novelty 18 Apr 2017 nineteen September 2014
Toll $229 $329
Retentivity bandwidth 256 224
Flake lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon RX 580

and

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

The differences in performance seem besides modest.


Should yous still have questions concerning option between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments department, and we shall reply.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" button well-nigh your favorite graphics menu.


AMD Radeon RX 580

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Competitors of Radeon RX 580 by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon RX 580's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce GTX TITAN Black, which is faster past two% and college by iii positions in our rating.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 580:

Competitors of GeForce GTX 970 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 970 from AMD is Radeon RX 590, which is well-nigh equal in speed and is lower past 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 970:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 100

Like GPU comparisons

Nosotros selected several comparisons of video cards with functioning more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here yous can encounter the user rating of the graphics cards, every bit well as rate them yourself.


Rate AMD Radeon RX 580 on a calibration of i to v:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you tin can inquire a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or written report an error or mismatch.


Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

California Consumer Privacy Human action ("CCPA")


Nether CCPA, Californian residents accept the correct to declare their preferences on the sale of data for advertising and marketing purposes. If you wish to change your preferences, click this link to launch our preference portal:

Californian residents likewise have the right to access and/or delete collected information most them. If you wish to invoke either right, please see this link.

We use a third-party to provide monetisation technologies for our site. You can review their privacy and cookie policy here.

Changes


We may update this privacy policy from time to time in order to reflect, for example, changes to our practices or for other operational, legal or regulatory reasons.

Contact us


For more than information about our privacy practices, if you have questions, or if you would similar to make a complaint, please contact us past east-mail at .

brinsonageres59.blogspot.com

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/Radeon-RX-580-vs-GeForce-GTX-970

0 Response to "Gtx 970 Vs Rx 580 8gb Benchmark"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel